Lenz's play was at first published anonymously. Students enjoyed reading an author, who, while not quite non-canonical, can be considered both an outsider and an innovator in relation to the established literary scene of his time.
Especially when reading literature from past epochs, there is the challenge of contextualizing instances in literature that reference offensive and harmful stereotypes, and acts of hostile and violent behavior towards minorities. I find it important to convey to students that the artistic and lexical vocabulary to deal with these issues was different than nowadays, and that viewpoints expressed by characters in the text are not necessarily those of the author. In Jakob Lenz's play The Soldiers, there is a scene featuring a Jewish character named Aaron. His home is entered at night by a group of soldiers, who climb into his bed and scare him deeply, only to play a prank at his expense on one of their own comrades. Aaron is not listed as a character in the beginning of the play, and does not feature hereon after. He also makes stereotypical utterances to mark him as “the Jew.” Students keenly observed that his character was a flat, offensive stereotype, not even listed as a character in the play. They objected strongly, and expressed their dislike with the author's artistic choice. I saw this as an opportunity to not only address these very important observations and reactions, but to also illuminate the aspect of social satire and critique present in Lenz's plays. While recognizing that the character of Aaron is indeed a stereotypical depiction of a Jewish person, we talked about how the play is named after the “soldiers,” and how they are characterized throughout as a violent and anti-social group. I brought up the historical context of the enlightenment, and in particular the so-called “Jewish question,” as well as the “Jewish enlightenment” (the haskalah), and how there was a beginning discourse addressing anti-Judaism and anti-Semitism, favoring the emancipation of Jews. We discussed the friendship between Gotthold Ephraim Lessing and Moses Mendelssohn. In that historical context, decoding the racist, sexist, and homophobic stereotypes on which the soldiers rely, such as the “greedy” and “horny” Jew (the soldiers were dressing up as women when they entered his nightly chamber) became a tool in pushing back against them. I also provided the students with an article in German addressing and analyzing this very scene, pointing out the ways in which Lenz can be read as an analysis of the social dynamics that lead to the violent socialization of the soldiers. We then talked about how in the past, theater directors and producers sometimes opted to leave this scene out, as not to appear as condoning anti-Semitism, and whether or not this was the best choice. On one hand, students had realized that Lenz was not affirming anti-Jewish clichés, but emphasizing how vile the soldiers were. Doing justice to that intention would be better than sanitizing the play to avoid any complications. On the other hand, they rightly felt that depicting Aaron as written in the play would not do justice to current sensitivities of audiences, nor to the intention of Lenz himself. One cannot simply portray this stereotype on a stage, but has to defamiliarize it, or otherwise expand this character to show a real individual, not a caricature. To that end, I gave students a creative prompt for one of their response papers, asking them to re-write the scene, for example with a monologue for Aaron alone, that could be staged instead of the original version. The following is a submission by a student, whose permission I obtained to include their work.
Im Aufsatz über Lenz' "Die Soldaten" schreibt Inge Stephan über die "Gefahr", "dass Sexismus, Homophobie und Antisemitismus affirmativ verdoppelt werden" (S. 253). Schreiben Sie einen Monolog für die Figur des "Aaron", der bei Lenz nur wenige kurze Zeilen spricht. Wie denkt Aaron über den Streich, den die Soldaten ihm spielen wollten?
AARON (als Rammler und die anderen das Haus verlassen haben): Was ist passiert? Gibt es denn keinen Rauber? (sitzt sich plötzlich, erschrocken) Und die Soldaten - sie sind nicht gekommen, um mir zu helfen - ich sehe es jetzt klar - nicht um mir zu helfen, sondern um mich auszulachen... (springt wütend auf) Nein, nicht um mich auszulachen! Wenn das nur wäre! Um mich sorgen sie nicht; ich war nicht Gegenstand ihres üblen Witzes, nein, dem würdigen Rammler war diese Ehre vorbehalten. Was war ich denn? Sag mir: Was war ich? Die Schurken! Sie bringen ihren kleinlichen Wettstreit in mein Haus - woher haben sie das Recht enthalten? Denken sie, ich sei nur ein Bestandteil ihres Streichs? Ach! Ich bin nie so fürchterlich verlegen gewesen. Ich werde es nicht ertragen. Ich muss etwas machen. Aber warte, Aaron! Rase nicht so eilig nach der Rache! Erinnere dich: Sie sind Soldaten. Was kann von Soldaten ein ehrlicher Mann erwarten, wenn nicht Narrheit und Unhöflichkeit? Ist es die Schuld die Soldaten, dass das Militär jeden Mann gegeneinander setzt, ihre Männlichkeit zu beweisen; ihre Schuld, dass jede Regiment Grausamkeit und Brutalität züchtet, wie Verderbnis in einem Bordell? Ich werde mich der Würmer erbarmen. Sie haben mir einen Streich gespielt? Einen großartigen lustigen Streich? Na ja, ich werde meinen eigenen Streich spielen. Wie sonst soll man sich mit Soldaten behandeln? Nicht mit dem Gesetz; vor der Juristerei lachen sie: Wir haben für unsere Regierung und unser Land die Leben geopfert, und was habt ihr gemacht? eingesperrte Bestien von braven, freien Menschen zu machen? Nein, die Soldaten sprechen nur eine Sprache, und sie ist der Wettbewerb; sie kennen nur eine Strafe, und sie ist die Entmannung. Man will sich gegen einen Soldat rächen? Man muss ihn mit den gleichen Waffen kämpfen. Ein Streich für die Sagen! Ein Streich über allen Streichen! (Er geht entschlossen zum Tisch) Sie werden sich wünschen, sie hatten nie den Namen Aarons gehört!